The Streamlined Nautilus: "Like a needle through sailcloth!"
Many of the designs presented
on the Some Nautilus Designs page have provisions for
withdrawing the wheelhouse into the hull, but few go into detail about the
mechanism. Here’s a summary of the arguments against retraction I’ve listed on the
Deviations
page. Withdrawing the pilothouse:
The text in Jeff Phillips’ article addresses the second concern by having only the upper part of the wheelhouse withdraw, keeping the controls stationary. Tom Hershey's Nautilus has a completely cylindrical wheelhouse to facilitate retraction. James Laing has suggested the existence of a sort of "battle bridge" in the bow with a window built into the hull to address the first concern. I (perhaps fortunately) missed the TV movie, but Todd Pullen describes the CBS/Hallmark Nautilus wheelhouse "as a large deck plate (with a port hole) hinged at the back which raised up to show another port hole forward and one on each side". |
Greg Sharpe’s newest design addresses the third concern by using a cylinder with heavy sealing gaskets (left). The cylindrical shape lends itself to sealing. Don Finnerty envisions a similar arrangement with a large moving piston, and proposes telescoping adjustments for the control linkages. He suggests moving the wheelhouse forward and providing a reinforced groove in the hull to provide the helmsman a narrow field of view forward when the structure is retracted. Ron Miller shows some of his retraction mechanism in the drawing to the right. Any simple withdrawal solution requires additional panels to close the openings resulting from the inclined sides of the structure noted by Aronnax. Several of the designs leave the openings uncovered. This serves the purpose by clearing the deck of protuberances but technically violates another part of the text: When the castaways climb aboard the Nautilus and search for a hatch, Aronnax describes a smooth surface with only two rings for handholds. |
Michael Holt references some of mid-19th century technology that Verne may have noticed for insight into his concepts. In particular, he cites the "oscillating cupola" designs of a Prussian Army Lt-Col Schumann. These fortress turrets were partially or completely retractable when not in use. Nobumitsu Kobayashi's Nautilus design (see the Design Catalog page) includes a reasonable solution to the visibility problem. His attack rendering shows the retracted wheelhouse with the tops of the forward windows visible. |
David Crawford suggests "a corridor along one side of the upper-level that would be rigid into the pilot house structure but pivot at a bulkhead parallel to the ship's axis. All the control cables would follow this corridor and exit through watertight fitting at the pivot point. Thus, the mechanical connections, while tight, would not go slack during transition. Since the ship has a double-hull, the pilot could conceivably use a narrow view through a tunnel above the saloon and opening just behind and above the ram fairing to sight his target." |
Before proceeding we should review relevant passages from the novel. Here, from "A Hecatomb" is Aronnax’s account of the preparations for attack in Verne’s words and from the Mercier Lewis translation. |
Je me disposais à descendre afin de les prévenir, lorsque le second monta sur la plate-forme. Plusieurs marins l'accompagnaient. Le capitaine Nemo ne les vit pas ou ne voulut pas les voir. Certaines dispositions furent prises qu'onaurait pu appeler le « branle-bas de combat » du Nautilus. Elles étaient très simples. La filière qui formait balustradeautour de la plate-forme. fut abaissée. De même, les cages du fanal et du timonier rentrèrent dans la coque de manière àl'affleurer seulement. La surface du long cigare de tôle n'offrait plus une seule saillie qui pût gêner sa manoeuvre. |
I was preparing to go down to remind them, when the second mounted the platform, accompanied by several sailors. Captain Nemo either did not or would not see them. Some steps were taken which might be called the signal for action. They were very simple. The iron balustrade around the platform was lowered, and the lantern and pilot cages were pushed within the shell until they were flush with the deck. The long surface of the steel cigar no longer offered a single point to check its manoeuvres. |
Here is the attack itself. |
Cependant,
la vitesse du Nautilus s'accrut sensiblement. C'était son élan qu'il
prenait ainsi. Toute sa coque frémissait. |
The speed of the Nautilus was accelerated. It was preparing to rush. The whole ship trembled. Suddenly I screamed. I felt the shock, but comparatively light. I felt the penetrating power of the steel spur. I heard rattlings and scrapings. But the Nautilus, carried along by its propelling power, passed through the mass of the vessel like a needle through sailcloth! |
Text from Zvi Har'El's Virtual Library |
Any discussion of retracting the wheelhouse should start with a description of the structure. "The Black River" contains the exterior description. |
Vers le milieu de la plate- |
Toward the middle of the platform the longboat, half buried in the hull of the vessel, formed a slight excrescence. Fore and aft rose two cages of medium height with inclined sides, and partly closed by thick lenticular glasses; one destined for the steersman who directed the Nautilus, the other containing a brilliant lantern to give light on the road. |
Here, from "The Arabian Tunnel", is Aronnax's description of its interior in Verne's own words, and Lewis's translation with my small improvements. |
Le
capitaine Nemo me conduisit vers l'escalier central. A mi-rampe, il ouvrit
une porte, suivit les coursives supérieures et arriva dans la cage du
pilote, qui, on le sait, s'élevait à l'extrémité de la plate-forme. ...
Le capitaine Nemo ne quittait pas du regard la boussole suspendue dans la
cabine à ses deux cercles concentriques. Sur un simple geste, le timonier
modifiait à chaque instant la direction du Nautilus. |
Captain
Nemo led me towards the central staircase; half way down he opened a door,
traversed the upper gangways,
and arrived
in the pilot's cage, which it may be remembered rose at the end
of the platform. It was a cabin measuring six feet square, very much like
that occupied by the pilot on the steamboats of the Mississippi or Hudson.
In the center was a wheel, placed vertically, and attached
to the tiller-rope, which ran to the stern
of the Nautilus. Four portholes
with lenticular glasses, mounted
in the cabin walls,
allowed the man at the wheel to see in all directions. This cabin was dark; but soon my eyes accustomed themselves to the darkness, and I saw the pilot, a strong man, with his hands resting on the spokes of the wheel. Outside, the sea appeared vividly lit up by the lantern, which shone from behind the cabin at the other end of the platform. "Now," said Captain Nemo, "Let us seek our passage." Electric wires connected the pilot's cage with the engine room, and from there the Captain could simultaneously communicate the direction and the speed to his Nautilus. He pressed a metal button, and at once the speed of the screw decreased. ... Captain
Nemo did not take his eye from the compass,
suspended in the
cabin in its two concentric rings.
At a simple gesture, the pilot modified the course of the Nautilus at
every moment.
|
Original text from Zvi Har'El's Virtual Library |
I returned to the original drawings for inspiration. Two structures are pictured at the ends of the deck. One, about knee high, has four or even five lenses in its sides. I've read speculation that this is the lantern*. The other is more triangular in shape with a lens to the front. This drawing pictures it thigh high, but others have it quite short, even to almost flat. Imagine it is the wheelhouse. The drawing of Nemo guiding the Nautilus through the Arabian tunnel (top) with its single sloping window, bears some small resemblance to this structure. And, notice the raised platform under the captain’s feet in the top picture. |
When retracted the hull is not completely smooth because some structure must remain for a forward looking view port. In theory, the wheelhouse could be located much farther forward where the slope of the hull is greater. Positioned there, a panel flush with the hull would be looking forward. A glance at my plan shows there is room there for retraction but the size of the salon makes placing it there impractical. The wheelhouse is accessed from the mid-section of the boat and passing the salon would necessitate crawling in the upper passage. |
Trying to keep the mechanicals to a minimum, I straightened the sloped sides of the wheelhouse (as in the de Neuville drawing) and adjusted the slope of the back so that the retracted structure fits neatly without openings that might need covering. Hinging at the front provides a forward looking window when retracted but complicates access, leaving a hatch in the floor as the only reasonable possibility. Since the salon fills a large part of the forward hull, I would have to place this retractable wheelhouse farther astern than in my present design. I'm currently working on revisions to incorporate this wheelhouse and other improvements. |
|
*Todd
Pullen offers the contrary interpretation, using this
reasoning: |
A number of folk have commented. Do you have an opinion? Please e-mail me.
10 Dec 00. This page and its contents, except as noted, © Copyright 1999, 2000 Michael & Karen Crisafulli. All rights reserved.